Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Agriculture and Food Science
Vol. 7Issue 42024pp. 317–329Published 26 November 2024
DOI 10.52589/AJAFS-3MCAYT0DShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
The intensifying demand for food production, driven by population growth and climate pressures, has placed a strain on agricultural systems worldwide, particularly in Africa and the European Union (EU). This paper presents a comparative analysis of the adoption of robotics in agriculture across these regions, exploring the current practices, limitations, and advancements shaping the future of sustainable farming. In Africa, limited infrastructure, high costs, and technological barriers hinder the integration of robotics, challenging smallholder farmers and reducing productivity. Conversely, the EU demonstrates more advanced adoption, supported by robust policy frameworks and technology infrastructure, although it faces challenges including workforce aging and the need for ethical guidelines in AI applications. This study highlights significant case studies within the EU, such as those in the Netherlands and Germany, showcasing the economic and environmental impacts of robotics in diverse farming models. The analysis extends to the benefits of robotics in increasing productivity and resource efficiency while reducing labor dependency, contributing to precision farming practices and environmental sustainability. The findings underscore the critical role of robotics in future agricultural systems, suggesting that while Africa faces more immediate barriers to adoption, targeted investments and policy adaptations could bridge these gaps. The study concludes by advocating for tailored, region-specific strategies to achieve sustainable agriculture through robotics, underscoring the technology's potential to address global food security challenges in Africa and the EU.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights