Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Agriculture and Food Science
Vol. 9Issue 12026pp. 13–30Published 20 January 2026
DOI 10.52589/AJAFS-BZVXOVPLShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This study compares the presence of essential and toxic elements in UK and African waters. Drinking water samples (n=93) were collected from Leicester, UK [45 bottled drinking water (BDW) and 48 tap drinking water (TDW)]. Concentrations of 26 elements were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Notably, cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) were detected only in TDW samples, with detection percentages of 25% and 60.4%, respectively. In contrast, very low concentrations of arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) were detected in 82.2% and 100% of BDW samples and in 88.9% and 95.6% of TDW samples, respectively. All detected element concentrations were within World Health Organization safety limits. The hazard quotient (HQ) and Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) values for toxic elements were below the permissible limits, suggesting no significant long-term health risks. In contrast, recent literature from some African countries has revealed high concentrations of toxic elements, such as Pb and As, with HQ and ILCR exceeding guidelines. Consumption of water can be higher in African countries, which have warmer climates, and this will further increase their exposure to toxic elements compared to the UK. There is an urgent need to lower toxic elements in African drinking waters through improvements to the water treatment and distribution systems.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights