Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Culture, History, Religion and Traditions
Vol. 8Issue 22025pp. 23–40Published 18 November 2025
DOI 10.52589/AJCHRT-OTAQ4SG2Research Article
Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This study examines how Ghanaian religious and moral values function as a de facto “court of public opinion,” influencing public perceptions of political accountability. Motivated by the 2023 Cecilia Abena Dapaah scandal, where public outrage over alleged misuse of public resources contributed to her resignation and legal investigation, the study explores how citizens invoke ethical and religious norms to demand accountability from public office holders. Drawing on Moral Community Theory, Habermas’ public sphere, and Social Accountability Theory, the analysis highlights how communal moral values, public deliberation, and citizen-driven oversight collectively shape leaders’ behavior. Findings reveal that while moral claims can pressure leaders, their effectiveness is contingent upon institutional mechanisms capable of enforcing accountability. The study underscores the importance of integrating moral norms with formal governance structures, civic education, and platforms for deliberation, suggesting that the interplay between moral authority and institutional oversight offers a culturally grounded pathway to ethical governance and strengthened public trust in Ghana.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights