Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Health, Nursing and Midwifery
Vol. 7Issue 22024pp. 235–248Published 19 June 2024
DOI 10.52589/AJHNM-LYN659B7Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
Introduction: The professional ethics of midwives at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) in Rivers State, Nigeria, represent a crucial aspect of healthcare delivery, influencing both patient care and educational frameworks within midwifery. This study investigated factors influencing attitudes and adherence to principles of medical ethics among practising midwives and midwifery students. Methodology: A cross-sectional quantitative designed was adopted to survey 124 participant drawn using purposive sampling. The participants predominantly aged between 18 and 45 years, with a minor segment over 46. The majority, 89.5%, were female, reflecting a significant gender imbalance, while males constituted only 10.5%. Data collection was carried out using questionnaire, which included items on demographic data and various ethical considerations in midwifery practice. Mean and standard deviation were employed for data analysis. Results: Findings from the study revealed positive attitude (3.41±0.773) and a strong adherence medical ethics principle (3.39±0.642). The most challenging factors to adherence were balancing conflicting ethical principles in complex cases(3.12 ± 0.694) and workplace culture and policies (3.01 ± 0.716) while regular training and updates on medical ethics (3.64 ± 0.483) and recognition and appreciation for ethical behaviour (3.45 ± 0.603) as the most effective ways to overcome the challenges. Conclusion: despite the positive attitude and high level of adherence to medical, challenges remain. As such, continuous education and reinforcement of ethical principles are imperative to ensure that these standards are not only understood theoretically but are also consistently applied in clinical practice.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights