Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Health, Nursing and Midwifery
Vol. 9Issue 32026pp. 154–172Published 26 August 2026
DOI 10.52589/AJHNM-HSB2BDDBResearch Article
Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
Background: CHW-led community malaria case management (CCMm) extends services to rural, hard-to-reach communities in Kailahun District, Sierra Leone, where the malaria burden is heaviest; yet the same standardised intervention produces different outcomes across chiefdoms. This paper asks how contextual conditions enable or block the mechanisms through which CHWs produce outcomes. Methods: A qualitative realist evaluation using the Context–Mechanism–Outcome framework drew on six key informant interviews, three CHW contextual interviews, and six focus group discussions (58 caregivers) and analyzed them thematically with realist-informed coding and text-network analysis. Results: Contextual influences spanned nine domains: geographic, health-system, socio-cultural, gender, economic, governance, programmatic, historical, and market. Traditional authority engagement and geographic accessibility were decisive across every tier, and the same conditions acted as facilitators when present and barriers when absent. Conclusion: Context is constitutive, not background; policy should stabilise a small set of conditions—above all supply continuity and traditional authority engagement—that determine whether its mechanisms fire.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights