Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies
Vol. 6Issue 12023pp. 1–11Published 1 February 2023
DOI 10.52589/AJMSS-CLQ73EUZShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
The study investigated the robustness of Quantile regression of count data over negative binomial regression, when there is overdispersion and presence of outlier. The study made use of a complete data and the data with 30% missing data which was imputed using Multiple Imputation by Chain Equation (MICE) in R and also an outlier was injected into the data during imputation of missing values. The Quantile Regression and Negative Binomial Regression estimates were compared and their model fits were also compared. Results showed that the quantile regression for count data provided a better model estimate with both complete data and data with multiple imputed value with comparison to the negative binomial regression in terms of AIC, BIC RMSE and MSE. Hence, Quantile Regression is better than the negative binomial regression when the researcher is interested in the effect of the independent variable on different points of the distribution of the response variable and when there is overdispersion and presence of an outlier.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights