Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies
Vol. 8Issue 12025pp. 77–83Published 17 January 2025
DOI 10.52589/AJMSS-L3LZF5LAShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This study presents a comparative analysis of six Fréchet distribution variants: Kumaraswamy Fréchet (KF), Exponentiated Fréchet (EF), Beta Fréchet (BF), Gamma Extended Fréchet (GExF), Odd Lomax Fréchet (OLxF), and the standard Fréchet (F) focusing on their structural properties, parameter estimation, and model performance. These distributions, characterized by varying levels of complexity and flexibility, are particularly effective for modelling extreme values and heavy tails, crucial in fields like econometrics and reliability analysis. Differences in Probability Density Functions (PDFs) reveal the enhanced adaptability of BF and GExF variants, attributed to their additional beta and gamma components. The models were applied to three datasets: Jobs made of Iron Sheets, Airborne Communication Transceiver Repairs, and Tax Revenue. The performance of the distributions under study was evaluated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The finding showed that the standard Fréchet distribution consistently outperformed its variants, achieving the lowest AIC and BIC values across datasets, indicating a superior balance of simplicity and adaptability. EF and KF variants demonstrated competitive performance but lacked the robustness of the standard Fréchet model, while OLxF and GExF showed higher AIC and BIC values due to potential over-parameterization. This study underscores the importance of aligning model complexity with dataset characteristics and highlights the standard Fréchet distribution as a versatile choice for analyzing extreme data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights