Loading...
Loading...
African Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies
Vol. 9Issue 32026pp. 45–61Published 11 September 2026
DOI 10.52589/AJMSS-CUY8H5GTResearch Article
Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
Aims: This study investigated the expression patterns of five crucial genes BRCA1, PALB2, CDK1, CDH1, and CHEK2 across breast cancer subtypes using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Study Design: A quantitative research design based on MANOVA was employed using gene expression data from 1,139 breast cancer patients representing multiple subtypes. Place and Duration of Study: The study utilized secondary genomic data obtained from publicly available breast cancer databases and was conducted over a six-month period. Methodology: Preliminary diagnostic tests assessed normality, multicollinearity, and multivariate outliers. Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated approximate normality, VIF values below 5 confirmed the absence of multicollinearity, and Mahalanobis distance showed no significant outliers (12.68 < 20.515). Although Levene’s and Box’s M tests indicated heterogeneity of variances and covariance matrices (p < 0.001), Pillai’s trace was adopted due to its robustness. Univariate analyses and Scheffe post hoc tests were subsequently conducted. Results: MANOVA revealed a highly significant overall effect of breast cancer subtype on combined gene expression profiles (Pillai’s Trace = 0.525, F = 48.09, p < 0.001, observed power = 1.000). BRCA1, CDK1, CDH1, and CHEK2 significantly discriminated subtypes (p < 0.001), while PALB2 showed marginal significance (p = 0.003). Luminal A and HER2 demonstrated the strongest gene-specific effects, whereas Luminal B showed the least differentiation. Conclusion: The findings confirm distinct subtype-specific gene expression patterns and demonstrate the effectiveness of MANOVA for genomic studies, highlighting its relevance for precision oncology and targeted breast cancer management.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights