Abstract:

This paper examines gender discrimination cases in labour arbitration, exploring the systemic challenges and effectiveness of arbitration in resolving workplace disputes. The research aims to investigate how gender biases influence arbitration outcomes and whether the process adequately addresses gender-based disparities in employment decisions. Using a qualitative approach, this study analyzes a sample of gender discrimination arbitration cases across multiple industries. The main findings reveal that while arbitration can resolve disputes, there are notable gaps, particularly regarding the representation of female claimants and the understanding of gender-related issues by arbitrators. The paper concludes that although labour arbitration offers a faster alternative to litigation, it is not immune to gender bias and calls for policy changes to enhance its fairness. Future research could focus on comparative analyses between arbitration and litigation outcomes in gender discrimination cases.