Gender Differences in the Adoption of Self-Service Technologies Among Students

Aminu Hamza; Mustapha Maidawa; Rilwan Sabo Muhammed

Gender Differences in the Adoption of Self-Service Technologies Among Students | AB Journals

Gender Differences in the Adoption of Self-Service Technologies Among Students

;
;

British Journal of Computer, Networking and Information Technology

Vol. 2Issue 12019pp. 18–33Published 17 June 2019

1,767Views

562Downloads

Metrics

Share Link

𝕏

Cite this

Citation unavailable for this article.

Abstract:

This study aims to empirically examine the factors that affect the gender differences in the adoption of Self-Service Technology (SST) among students in Nigeria. The four factors examined in this study are performance expectancy (PE), facilitating condition (FC), social inﬂuence (SI) and service quality (SQ), using gender as the moderating variable. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was utilized in this study. Stratified sampling method was used with a total valid 355 respondents, which were randomly drawn from Students of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi state, Nigeria. Results of the regression analysis revealed that Performance Expectance (PE), Service Quality (SQ) and Facilitating Condition (FC) have significant and positive relationship with the behavioural intention to adopt SST. Similarly, the independent t-test results revealed that PE significantly influences the Intention of men to adopt SST higher than women. While SQ, significantly influences the Intention of women to adopt SST higher than men.

Keywords:6

Copyrights

Authors retain copyright in their articles and have unrestricted rights to reuse, republish, archive, share, and distribute their work after publication.
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.

Loading…

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.