Loading...
Loading...
British Journal of Education, Learning and Development Psychology
Vol. 6Issue 32023pp. 7–24Published 14 August 2023
DOI 10.52589/BJELDP-HSFXTK2FShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This investigation was carried out to examine the effect of think-pair-share on high school learners’ academic attainment in fractions and the most effective stage of the think-pair-share. Two research questions and five hypotheses guided this study. An explanatory sequential mixed method design was used. Purposive and convenience sampling techniques were used to select the first-years and the 78 participants, respectively. Teacher-made fractions achievement tests and interviews were used as the data-gathering instruments. Students’ academic achievement was analysed using independent and paired samples t-tests whilst the interview data was analysed thematically. The study found that learners who received fractions instructions using the think-pair-share model outperformed their colleagues who were taught fractions without think-pair-share. Also, the performance of students at the pair stage was higher than the performance of the same students at the think stage on the same test items. It was again found that intolerance, lack of self-confidence and inability to build consensus on the part of some students affected their performances at the pair stage. It was, therefore, concluded that Think-Pair-Share is effective in teaching fractions and that the most effective stage of the Think-Pair-Share strategy is the pair stage. It was therefore recommended that teachers be encouraged to use the think-pair-share teaching strategy in their teaching and that think-pair-share should be made to form an integral part of the Senior High School mathematics curriculum. Again, teachers and the Ghana education service should consider assessing students in pairs. Also, teachers should encourage students to be tolerant and confident in themselves.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights