Loading...
Loading...
British Journal of Contemporary Education
Vol. 5Issue 22025pp. 74–92Published 6 August 2025
DOI 10.52589/BJCE-BHIBZ9MVResearch Article
Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This study examined the significance of differentiated techniques in accelerating learning achievement in business studies among Form Three learners in public secondary schools in Nairobi County, Kenya. Triggered by persistent decrease in learner mean score in accounting concepts in summative exams covered at Form Three, the study investigated whether Business Studies textbooks employing varied instructional strategies contribute to improved academic outcomes. Anchored on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and guided by positivism philosophical underpinning, the study utilized mixed methods approach incorporating the Solomon four-group experimental design to control pretest sensitization effects. A total of 200 learners were sampled using stratified random and purposive sampling techniques. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and linear regression models. Descriptive findings revealed that learners perceived differentiated instructional elements such as varied teaching approaches, alternative assignments, and responsive learning materials as beneficial for mastering concepts and boosting engagement. Regression analysis indicated a significant positive relationship between differentiated techniques and learner achievement in the experimental group (R² = 0.396, β = 0.217, p < .001), while no significant relationship was observed in the control group (β = -0.141, p = 0.629). The findings depicted that effective textbook design incorporating differentiated techniques enhances learner motivation and academic success. However, in the absence of intervention, these techniques alone were insufficient to yield significant learning gains. The study recommends that the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD) embed differentiated strategies within textbook guidelines and support teacher training to ensure effective classroom implementation of these strategies.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights