Loading...
Loading...
Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Studies
Vol. 4Issue 42024pp. 89–98Published 6 November 2024
DOI 10.52589/JARMS-4HTZQR20Research Article
Share Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
This paper investigates the scope and limitations of judicial oversight in labor arbitration awards, focusing on the balance between arbitration autonomy and the need for judicial intervention. The research addresses the central question: To what extent should courts intervene in arbitration awards in the labor sector? Through a doctrinal analysis of statutes, case law, and scholarly perspectives, the paper evaluates how judicial oversight impacts labor arbitration, particularly in Nigeria, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Findings indicate that while judicial intervention is essential to ensure fairness and compliance with public policy, excessive involvement can undermine the efficiency and finality of the arbitration process. The study concludes that an optimal balance between judicial oversight and the autonomy of arbitration is critical to maintaining a functional and just labor arbitration system. Keywords: Judicial Oversight, Labor Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Public Policy, Nigeria, United States, United Kingdom
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights