Loading...
Loading...
British Journal of Contemporary Education
Vol. 3Issue 12023pp. 22–42Published 27 March 2023
DOI 10.52589/BJCE-EG98KCVDShare Link
Cite this
Citation unavailable for this article.
Abstract:
There is a growing trend globally, among institutions of higher learning to either claim to be world-class Centers of Excellence or to aspire to be. Evidence of the quest for world-classness by these institutions abound in their strategic mandates, vision, and mission statements. Public universities in Ghana are no exception to the rule, and there seem to be a close competition between so-called traditional universities and newly created ones for world-classness albeit through vision and mission statements. This study sought to examine successes chalked by three selected traditional universities in Ghana and the coping strategies initiated by two recently established ones in their quest to distinguish themselves as world-class centers of excellence. The study adopted the exploratory research method or approach. Relevant documents reviewed included the Act of Parliament establishing the regulator of tertiary education in Ghana; the Acts of Parliament establishing the five selected public universities for the study; strategic mandates, vision, mission statements, core values and reports from the selected public universities. The findings revealed a rigorous criteria or performance indicators prescribed by globally renowned league tables, notably the Times Higher Education World Universities Ranking League. It further revealed that the traditional universities, have featured prominently on world league tables on the basis of global reputation for research, quality of conference papers, citation impact score and number of international collaborations or linkages created, while the newly created ones are yet to make an impression. Thus, the study recommends the prioritization of benchmarked practices.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and contributor(s) and not of AB Journals or its editors. AB Journals remains neutral and accepts no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyrights