Analyzing Abel Damina’s Teaching on Tithing through the Lens of the Spiral of Silence Theory.

Publication Date: 02/12/2024

DOI: 10.52589/BJMCMR-UBMAYBQT


Author(s): Kalita Aruku, Inyali Peter Ogar (Ph.D.), Joseph Ikangkang (Ph.D.), Anruchi Peter-Wagbara.

Volume/Issue: Volume 4 , Issue 4 (2024)



Abstract:

The practice of tithing has evolved over the years, with various theological leaders offering differing interpretations and approaches to its significance. This article examines the teachings of Dr. Abel Damina, a prominent figure in contemporary Christian evangelism, concerning the practice of tithing, which specifically advocates for appreciation tithing over obligatory contributions in line with scriptural provisions. The concept of appreciation tithing stems from the idea that individuals should give joyfully, driven by gratitude rather than compulsion. To deepen the understanding of this paradigm, the Spiral of Silence Theory, developed by Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, is utilized as a lens. According to this hypothesis, people are less inclined to voice their opinions when they believe they belong to a minority group, which might result in the suppression of different points of view. On the other hand, people feel more comfortable expressing when its perceived the opinion is popular. By applying this theory, the article seeks to explore the implications of Damina's teachings within the larger discourse of Christian giving and the social dynamics that could influence a congregant's willingness to either embrace or challenge these ideas. The article concludes that societal constraints and community attitudes play a significant role in shaping the debate surrounding religious and other issues that are considered sacred amd recommends among other things for the encouragement and provisions for platforms for a robust discussion on issues of giving and other contentious Church doctrines for better understanding and application for the good of society.


Keywords:

Abel Damina, Tithing, Spiral of Silence Theory, Religious Discourse, Minority Opinion.


No. of Downloads: 0

View: 509




This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0