Funding Agency Engagement: A Panacea to Improving Community Agricultural Projects in Kigoma, Tanzania.
Publication Date: 15/06/2026
DOI: 52589/RJAED-SP04ZGVJ
Author(s): Witness Ivon, Kenneth Otieno (Ph.D.), Peter Ngatia (Ph.D.).
Volume/Issue: Volume 5, Issue 1 (2026)
Page No: 57-72
Journal: Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development (RJAED)
Abstract:
Agricultural development projects are essential for advancing food security, livelihoods, and rural economic growth, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where agriculture underpins community wellbeing. However, their long-term success depends on meaningful and inclusive funding agencies' engagement that actively involves other actors such as farmers, government agencies, and civil society organizations throughout the project cycle. This study was guided by the objective of examining the influence of funding agencies’ engagement on the performance of agricultural projects in Kigoma Region, exploring key dimensions of funding agency participation that promote relevance, sustainability, and long-term impact. Data was collected from AMCOS members, government officials, project team members, and community leaders using structured questionnaires. Validity and reliability were confirmed through expert review, pilot testing, and internal consistency analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression (SPSS V26), while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings revealed that funding agencies' engagement significantly influences the performance of agricultural projects with a positive and significant effect. Funding agencies’ involvement (β = 0.404, p = 0.000) portrayed the positive and statistically significant predictor, implying that financial oversight, technical guidance, and continuous support from funding institutions substantially enhanced project performance. The study concluded that effective, inclusive, and well-structured engagement by funding agencies enhances the accountability, efficiency, and sustainability of agricultural projects. It recommends formalizing early-stage co-design meetings with funding agencies before project approval and drafting Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) that clearly outline roles, expected outputs, and funding timelines. This ensures alignment between financial priorities and project objectives. Quarterly supervisions and proper disbursement schedules to enhance accountability and transparency to improve project outcomes in the Kigoma Region. Funding agencies’ engagement and project governance allow timely completion of projects within budget, which eventually strengthens participatory governance structures, optimizing early and sustained engagement of funding agencies, and institutionalizing structured.
Keywords:
Funding Agencies’ Engagement, Performance, Agricultural Projects, Kigoma Region, Sustainability, Accountability, Resource-Based Theory.
